Which legal defense would be applicable if a medical procedure was performed without consent?

When considering legal defenses applicable in the context of medical procedures performed without consent, the focus is on the nature of consent in medical ethics and law. The correct choice, which pertains to medical procedures, accurately reflects the legal principle that consent is a fundamental requirement before any medical treatment or procedure can be performed on a patient.

In medical law, the principle of informed consent requires that a patient understands and agrees to the procedures being performed on them. If a medical procedure occurs without this consent, it may be viewed as a legal violation, potentially leading to claims of battery or negligence against the medical professional involved. The law recognizes the patient's autonomy and right to make decisions regarding their own body; thus, performing a procedure without consent disregards that autonomy.

The other options do not relate to the context of medical procedures. Self-defense pertains to the justification for using force to protect oneself, property defense involves legal arguments for protecting one’s property rights, and home defense typically pertains to defending one’s residence from intruders. None of these options are relevant to the issue of consent in medical practices.