What is the primary function of the Opinion Rule under Section 76?

The primary function of the Opinion Rule under Section 76 is to exclude opinion evidence without substantial proof, aligning with the principle that evidence presented in court should be based on facts that can be substantiated. This rule emphasizes the importance of reliable and relevant evidence, ensuring that opinions presented do not overshadow factual evidence, which could lead to confusion or misleading conclusions for the court.

By excluding opinions that lack substantial backing, the rule helps maintain the integrity of the judicial process, focusing the court's attention on the factual basis of cases rather than subjective interpretations. This is crucial in ensuring that trials are fair and that decisions are based on a solid foundation of evidence rather than mere opinion.

Although there is a provision for exceptions regarding expert opinions, these are strictly governed and require that the expert testimony be based on specialized knowledge that will assist the court in understanding the evidence or determining a fact in issue. This creates a framework where expert opinions can be included, but only if they meet the requisite standards of reliability and relevance, further supporting the idea behind the Opinion Rule.