What does "reasonable suspicion" feel like?

"Reasonable suspicion" relates to a standard utilized primarily in law enforcement that allows police officers to stop and question an individual if they believe that the person may be involved in criminal activity. It is based on a combination of factual observations and rational inferences drawn from those observations.

When considering what "reasonable suspicion" feels like, it embodies a positive feeling of apprehension or mistrust, originating from factual circumstances rather than mere intuition or prejudice. This form of suspicion arises from specific, articulable facts that would make a reasonable person suspicious about a potential crime happening or about to occur.

While the other choices may reflect certain feelings or opinions, they lack the substantive basis required to qualify as "reasonable suspicion." For instance, an ideal wondering is too abstract and vague. A slight opinion without any evidence does not provide a solid foundation for law enforcement actions. Similarly, unverified assumptions based on stereotypes can lead to bias and do not meet the factual threshold necessary for reasonable suspicion. Thus, the positive feeling of apprehension or mistrust, grounded in observed facts, is the most accurate representation of what "reasonable suspicion" entails.