In the context of admissible evidence, what is the requirement of relevance according to the Evidence Act?

The requirement of relevance in the context of admissible evidence according to the Evidence Act refers to the necessity for evidence to directly relate to the facts of the case. This means that for evidence to be considered pertinent, it must have a logical connection to the issues being decided in the legal proceedings. If evidence is applicable to the case, it aids in establishing either the truth of a fact in question or the proof of a legal argument.

Contextually, options suggesting that evidence must be current and up to date, collected by police, or easily accessible do not align with the core principle of relevance. While having current or accessible evidence may play a role in practical legal proceedings, it is the relevance of the evidence to the specific case that fundamentally determines its admissibility. Evidence can be relevant regardless of its source or how easily it can be obtained, as long as it serves to substantiate a fact at issue in the case.